Labor Supervision Successfully Mediate Tianshui One Employee's Resignation Due To Wage Disputes

Du Ping, a job seeker in Qingshui County, Tianshui, was appointed as the front desk supervisor when she applied for a job with the hotel owner, but when she was hired, she was transferred back and forth. Because of his dissatisfaction with his boss's arbitrary adjustment of his job, Du Ping offered to resign, but the 1500 yuan salary was detained. Recently, under the mediation of the local labor and social security supervision team, she got what she deserved. Labor remuneration 。

Du Ping came to a chafing dish store in Maiji District in mid September 2013, when she talked with her boss, Cai, for a monthly salary of 1800 yuan, and signed a labor contract for a year. But after the official work, the former supervisor has not left the office. Her boss, Cai, temporarily lets her familiar with the work at the bar, and the salary is temporarily released by the bar post, which is 1300 yuan per month. Two months later, the former director resigned and she took over the position of the front office director.

Shortly after that, a bar worker suddenly appeared in the hot pot shop. Resignation The boss, Tsai Mou, wants Du Ping to take over the bar again instead of serving as the front office supervisor. Du Ping thought that he had applied for the position of supervisor, and was fully competent for the job during his charge. He never had any mistakes in his work. It was difficult for her to accept her job without consulting her and asking her for permission. Therefore, she refused the request of the boss, Cai Mou.

The boss, Cai Mou, was annoyed by Du Ping's refusal to adjust posts. He asked Du Ping to obey the post or leave. Du Ping then resigned and asked his boss to pay 1500 yuan in arrears, but was refused.

Recently, in Maiji District labor supervision Under the mediation of the brigade, the two sides finally reached a settlement intention. Du Ping got the 1500 yuan wage owed by him, and the labor contract was relieved from the hot pot shop.

The labour inspector who participated in the mediation of the case resolved that the adjustment of the incumbent position of the worker should be in accordance with the thirty-fifth provision of the labor contract law, and that the labor contract must be agreed upon by both parties. In this case, when the job seeker does not recognize the situation, the owner of the hotpot can change the employee's job at random, and it can only be identified as the unilateral behavior of the hot pot shop, and the effect of the change of the labor contract does not occur. Therefore, the owner of the chafing dish shop unauthorized adjustment of staff work practices violated the relevant provisions of the labor contract law.